Hi, Friends & Fellow
Runners:
Did you know that the annual
injury rate among runners is an astounding 80% or thereabouts, more than in any
other sport? That means you could pick
100 runners completely at random and feel reasonably certain that over the
course of a year they would suffer roughly 80 mishaps of greater or lesser
severity.
Perhaps as disturbing
is the fact that the prevalence of injuries in our sport has remained a relative
constant over at least the past decade.
This has been true despite significant advances in the design and
construction of running’s most important piece of equipment – the running shoe
– and despite comparable improvements in other products such as orthotic
inserts, knee straps and braces, self-massage tools, and sports tape. Conclusion #1, therefore, is that the “right”
shoes and equipment are simply not enough to keep us out of harm’s way.
As well, an increasing
percentage of injuries occur or get worse after medical intervention. The reason is that doctors, chiropractors and
therapists frequently focus on the symptoms of an injury rather than the cause
-- or they misdiagnose the problem in the first place. Conclusion #2, therefore, is that the specialist
we visit can potentially do more harm than good.
Underlying this depressing
scenario is what I’d call the “law of unintended consequences.” The shoe manufacturers spend millions to
incorporate motion control, stability or additional cushioning features into
their products. They do it all with the
best of motives. But in the end what
they seem to accomplish, more than anything else, is to shield us from our own
shortcomings.
If our basic problem
is poor biomechanics, for instance, and that problem is not addressed, it will
sooner or later manifest itself in an injury.
The progression over time can often take on a certain inevitability if
and as we become increasingly serious about our running and demand more from
our bodies. We start with the best shoes
we can find for our feet, then later we add orthotics, then we resort to
physical therapy, and, finally, in a worst case, we undergo surgery. And the progression is speeded up along the
way if a well-meaning medical professional masks the root of the problem by
prescribing an anti-inflammatory and rest – or by telling us we have a pulled
muscle when in fact we have a stress fracture.
In the interests of full disclosure, I should
point out that I’ve had two serious injuries over the past several years, both
of which were originally misdiagnosed by medical professionals. I was
told in the first instance that I had a groin strain and, as a result,
underwent physical therapy and exercise in the weeks leading up to the 2007
Niagara Falls International Marathon. As
it turned out, I actually had a hernia condition and wound up crossing the
finish line of that race in excruciating pain, while holding my swollen stomach
in my right hand. I underwent surgery
two weeks later.
In the second instance, I went to a doctor with
pain in my left foot. The diagnosis was
a stretched tendon in the foot and, once again, physical therapy and exercise
were prescribed. Unfortunately, the tendon was not stretched; it was ruptured –
which meant that the therapy and exercise were only worsening the
condition. Here again I required surgery
and, as a consequence, missed an opportunity to participate in the 2009 World
Masters Games in Sydney, Australia and to run in the Boston Marathon the
following year.
Timothy Noakes, author
of the seminal book on our sport, called “Lore
of Running,” states simply and succinctly that we should never seek
treatment for a running-related injury from a medical professional who himself
is not a runner. And Runner’s World magazine
has offered a “runner’s checklist” for determining whether a particular
specialist is the best person to solve our running problem. Here are some of the questions that the
magazine suggests we ask him or her: Do you have a specialty in Sports Medicine?
Do you run? What should we bring to the appointment? (The “correct” answer would include our
training log and running shoes.) And, finally, how much time will you spend
with me? (Expect it to be at least
30 minutes.)
Let’s cut to the quick
here. We must recognize, first and
foremost, that we and no one else are the first line of defence against
injury. And this means, among other
things, that we should appreciate that stress and recovery are the yin and yang
principles of effective training, ensure that our running form is as good as it
can be, engage in strength training on a regular basis, and respond promptly to
any unusual aches or pain that might signal the onset of injury. If, despite
such precautions, we still wind up a part of an 80% injury statistic, then at
least we won’t have to second-guess ourselves.
Coach Stephen